Procedural macros in Rust are a great thing for many purposes (implementing custom derives, domain-specific languages inside Rust, etc). However, the use of procedural macros imposes one very inconvenient constraint: a crate that defines procedural macros can export nothing but procedural macros. This usually leads us to usi multiple crates to do exactly one thing (remember serde and serde_derive?). In this article, I will review an approach to this problem I have seen in the failure crate that allows us to import exactly one crate.

The project structure

All libraries I have seen so far rely on workspaces when they need to build a "simple" crate and a proc-macro crate. The generic structure for that is:

workspace
├── lib_crate/
├── proc_macro_crate/
└── Cargo.toml

with Cargo.toml that looks like that:

[workspace]
members =  ["lib_crate", "proc_macro_crate"]

Usually, lib_crate contains the definitions of traits, structures and procedures and proc_macro_crate contains procedural macros that generate code which reuses definitions from lib_crate.

The actual trick

In many libraries what you need to do is to import two crates:

#[macro_use]
extern crate proc_macro_crate;
extern crate lib_crate;

If you don't want your users to do that, you can use a pretty simple hack. Cargo does not prohibit to re-export procedural macros, so you can just re-export them in your lib_crate!

lib_crate/Cargo.toml:

[dependencies]
proc_macro_crate = { path = "../proc_macro_crate", version = "0.1.0" }

lib_crate/src/lib.rs:

#[macro_use]
extern crate proc_macro_crate;

pub use proc_macro_crate::*;

As they do not need to import two separate crates anymore Cargo.toml and their code look a bit cleaner.